正式抗议！利物浦就范戴克进球被吹向裁判公司提出严重质疑（利物浦官方申诉：就范戴克被判无效进球向裁判机构提出强烈质疑）

Summarizing Liverpool’s protest

It looks like I need to respond to a message in Chinese regarding Liverpool's official protest over a Van Dijk goal being disallowed. They haven’t asked a direct question, but they might want a news summary. I’ll give a concise brief about the match context. There was a notable incident involving Van Dijk in the Carabao Cup final in February 2024 against Chelsea, where he scored a goal that was ruled out for offside.Clarifying details of the incident

I’m focusing on the EFL Cup final between Liverpool and Chelsea in 2024. Van Dijk had a goal disallowed around the 60th minute due to a controversial offside call involving Endo and Gakpo. It seems Endo interfered with play by blocking a defender, which is why the goal was ruled out. Additionally, Liverpool appears to be filing an official complaint to PGMOL regarding this decision, similar to a past incident with a disallowed Diaz goal.Requesting clarification on news

I’m considering the user might be referring to news from January 2025, but since today is December 29, 2025, I must be careful about my knowledge. My last cutoff was in October 2024, so I need to avoid claiming specifics from after that date. The user didn’t specify which match or date, so I’ll ask for clarification. I'll offer to summarize or analyze relevant news and provide context on how protests work in the EPL. This way, I can keep it concise and valuable!Planning response for news inquiry

I’m thinking about how to acknowledge the user's headline and ask for more details, like the specific match, date, or event they’re referencing. While waiting for that, I can give a quick overview of the VAR process and common points of controversy like offside interference and fouls. I'll explain the formal protest process to PGMOL, and possible outcomes like explanations or referee changes. If the user wants help writing a news piece or social media post, I can offer a template or outline. I should be concise and provide clear next steps!

这是在说范戴克某场比赛的进球被判无效后，利物浦向PGMOL（英格兰职业比赛裁判公司）提出正式质疑的事吗？我这边没有该场次的具体时间与判罚细节。能否补充比赛日期/赛事对阵或一段判罚片段链接？我可以据此做精确复盘。先给你简要框架和可能走向：

• 常见争议点：越位（被动/主动干扰、阻挡对手）、定位球时的身体对抗阈值、提前/延迟吹停导致的VAR介入边界、画线与碰撞点判定、犯规在先/在后叠加。
• 俱乐部“正式抗议”流程：向PGMOL/联赛提交问题清单+视频截帧，申请VAR沟通音频；PGMOL通常会答复并在必要时公开说明与承认错误，但比赛结果通常不改变。
• 可能后续：PGMOL解释或致歉；涉事裁判短期停哨/降级指派；执法指引微调（例如“干扰守门员/防守球员”判定的操作细则）；极端情况下重赛极罕见。
• 技术要点复核清单（用于你内部复盘或对外沟通）：
  • 越位线与触球瞬间是否一致；遮挡/阻挡是否实质影响防守动作
  • 身体接触是否达到犯规阈值，是否有先后犯规
  • 主裁现场视角与VAR介入是否符合“明显且显著错误”标准
  • 画线基准点、帧选取和门将视线/动作受限证据

如果你需要对外发布，我可以按你口吻写两版：

1. 新闻快讯版（200-300字，标题+导语+两条关键信息+PGMOL回应占位）。
2. 复盘长文（800-1200字，事件时间线+规则解读+关键画面逐帧+可能裁委会结论+对联赛层面影响）。

告诉我比赛信息和你希望的立场强度（中性/强硬/技术流），我马上给稿。